Prediction of full-life axial compression performance of steel-reinforced concrete bridge piers in marine environments
-
摘要: 为提升海洋环境下桥梁结构的耐久性和性能预测精度,基于半经验时变腐蚀模型,确定了海洋环境下钢骨混凝土(SRC)桥墩内置钢材的初始腐蚀时间;通过分析海洋环境中钢筋截面面积与屈服强度的时变退化规律,提出了型钢时变腐蚀率及力学性能劣化的量化表征方法;基于时变腐蚀模型的计算结果,设计制作了11个不同服役年限的SRC桥墩试件,通过电化学加速腐蚀试验与轴压性能试验,系统研究了腐蚀损伤后SRC桥墩在轴压作用下的破坏模式和时变性能劣化规律;通过理论分析与推导,提出了海洋环境下SRC桥墩的时变轴压承载力预测公式,并通过试验数据验证了公式的合理性。研究结果表明:保护层厚度显著影响钢材的初始腐蚀时间,钢材性能退化速率受服役时间和腐蚀电流密度共同影响;随着服役周期的延长,SRC桥墩的轴压性能显著退化,全寿命周期内SRC桥墩的极限承载力、变形能力和初始刚度分别下降了54.1%、54.3%和68.2%;极限承载力和初始刚度的劣化拐点出现在20年服役期,而变形能力的劣化拐点则延迟至50年服役期;基于所提出的公式,预测试验桥墩的全寿命轴压承载力的相对误差在6%以内,低于现行各国规范的预测误差,说明综合考虑混凝土开裂与腐蚀钢材约束效应,能够显著提高海洋环境下SRC桥墩全寿命轴压性能的预测精度。Abstract: To improve the durability and performance prediction accuracy of bridge structures in marine environments, the initial corrosion time of embedded steel in steel-reinforced concrete (SRC) bridge piers in marine environments was determined based on a semi-empirical time-dependent corrosion model. By analyzing the time-dependent degradation laws of the cross-sectional area and yield strength of reinforcement in marine environments, a quantitative characterization method for the time-varying corrosion rate and mechanical performance degradation of section steel was proposed. Based on the calculation results of the time-dependent corrosion model, 11 SRC bridge pier specimens with different service years were fabricated. Through electrochemical accelerated corrosion tests and axial compression performance tests, the failure modes and time-dependent degradation behavior of SRC bridge piers under axial load after corrosion damage were systematically investigated. Through theoretical analysis and derivation, a time-dependent axial compression bearing capacity prediction formula for SRC bridge piers in marine environments was proposed, and the rationality of the formula was verified by experimental data. Research results show that the thickness of the protective layer significantly affects the initial corrosion time of the steel, and the degradation rate of the steel performance is influenced by both service time and corrosion current density. As the service time increases, the axial compression performance of the bridge piers deteriorates significantly. The ultimate bearing capacity, ductility, and initial stiffness of SRC bridge piers decrease by 54.1%, 54.3%, and 68.2%, respectively, during the full-life cycle. The degradation inflection points of ultimate bearing capacity and initial stiffness occur at 20 years of service, while the ductility degradation inflection point is delayed to 50 years. Based on the proposed formula, the relative error in predicting the full-life axial compression bearing capacity of the experimental bridge piers is within 6%, lower than the prediction error of existing national standards. This indicates that considering the coupling effect of concrete cracking and the confinement effect of corroded steel can significantly improve the prediction accuracy of the full-life axial compression performance of SRC bridge piers.
-
方程 取值 DCl=DCl, reff1(h)f2(T)f3(t)f4(Cf) DCl, ref=7.94×10-12 m2·s-1 DCl, ref=10aw/c-b a=2.4, b=12.06, w/c=0.40 f1(h)=1/{1+[(1-h)/(1-hc)]4} hc=0.75 f2(T)=exp[U/R(1/Tref-1/T)] U=41.8 kJ·mol-1, R=8.314 J·(mol·K)-1, Tref=293 K f3(t)=(tref/t)m2 tref=28 d, m2=0.35 f4(Cf)=1-kClCfm1 kCl=8.366, m1=0.5 Ct=Cb+mwCf mw=0.08 Cb=cCfd c=1.05, d=0.36 表 2 试件设计细节
Table 2. Details of the specimens
试件编号 服役年限 H型钢腐蚀率/% 纵筋腐蚀率/% 箍筋腐蚀率/% S-T0-1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CS-T10-2 10 0.0 7.2 13.5 CS-T20-3 20 4.7 18.7 30.7 CS-T30-4 30 12.1 30.2 47.9 CS-T40-5 40 19.3 41.7 65.2 CS-T50-6 50 26.4 53.2 82.5 CS-T60-7 60 37.7 64.7 99.7 CS-T70-8 70 49.9 76.2 100.0 CS-T80-9 80 53.1 87.7 100.0 CS-T90-10 90 53.1 99.2 100.0 CS-T100-11 100 53.1 100.0 100.0 表 3 实测腐蚀率和钢材时变力学性能
Table 3. Measured corrosion rates and time-varying mechanical properties of steels
试件编号 服役年限 H型钢(Q235A) 纵筋(HRB400) 箍筋(HPB300) ρha/% fyh/MPa fuh/MPa Eha/GPa ρla/% fyl/MPa ful/MPa Ela/GPa ρsa/% fys/MPa fus/MPa Esa/GPa S-T0-1 0 0.0 246.5 405.2 205.2 0.0 421.6 588.6 216.3 0.0 335.7 520.1 213.9 CS-T10-2 10 0.3 245.1 410.5 204.9 6.9 407.3 569.8 213.4 13.2 313.9 489.8 204.6 CS-T20-3 20 5.1 238.7 394.6 201.8 18.9 382.4 545.0 205.8 31.1 283.1 458.8 195.2 CS-T30-4 30 12.3 228.5 381.3 195.6 30.6 356.1 518.1 200.5 46.8 255.4 439.0 188.7 CS-T40-5 40 18.9 220.7 362.8 191.7 41.5 332.9 464.8 194.7 64.6 227.5 352.5 181.5 CS-T50-6 50 26.1 212.9 356.6 186.2 53.6 306.6 428.9 190.2 81.5 199.8 311.7 174.8 CS-T60-7 60 38.2 197.8 327.0 177.1 64.1 284.5 405.5 185.6 97.2 172.4 279.4 168.3 CS-T70-8 70 50.6 181.4 302.7 168.7 76.8 259.2 377.1 179.3 98.1 170.8 293.6 167.6 CS-T80-9 80 52.3 177.9 292.4 167.4 87.3 235.6 328.9 175.8 98.6 169.9 263.2 167.1 CS-T90-10 90 52.9 177.3 297.0 166.9 98.5 213.9 299.2 170.7 99.2 168.7 263.2 166.3 CS-T100-11 100 53.6 175.6 290.3 166.3 99.4 212.3 302.6 169.1 99.7 168.1 272.4 165.8 表 4 钢骨混凝土桥墩的时变轴压性能
Table 4. Time-varying axial compressive properties of SRC bridge piers
试件编号 屈服位移/mm 屈服荷载/kN 极限承载力/kN 极限位移/mm 延性 初始刚度/(kN·mm-1) 破坏模式 S-T0-1 1.61 1 150.9 1 693.1 5.22 2.34 1 220.1 保护层局部开裂 CS-T10-2 1.59 1 393.9 1 518.9 4.61 2.21 1 104.3 CS-T20-3 1.60 1 214.9 1 310.2 4.18 2.09 837.2 CS-T30-4 1.65 1 137.8 1 220.5 3.93 1.94 786.7 CS-T40-5 1.69 1 071.9 1 136.8 3.81 1.84 702.9 CS-T50-6 1.68 1 011.8 1 054.5 3.74 1.74 610.8 CS-T60-7 1.76 926.2 947.4 3.52 1.47 502.4 保护层贯穿开裂 CS-T70-8 1.80 840.5 852.5 3.41 1.43 448.9 CS-T80-9 1.90 779.5 819.6 3.03 1.22 404.3 CS-T90-10 1.93 732.9 792.1 2.82 1.14 389.9 CS-T100-11 1.93 698.7 776.5 2.74 1.07 389.5 -
[1] LIN Y H, LI X T, CHEN L B, et al. Performance analysis and prediction of axial stability capacity for CES slender columns subjected to chloride corrosion[J]. Structures, 2025, 80: 109917. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2025.109917 [2] LIN Y H, XING Z Q, CHEN L B, et al. Axial stability of chloride-corroded CES slender columns: Experimental and numerical study[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2025, 22: e04671. doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04671 [3] ZHU Y, XING Z Q, GUO Y, et al. Corrosion-compression failure analysis of circular SRC short columns under chloride environment[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2025, 169: 109164. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.109164 [4] LI X T, LIN Y H, ZHANG C L, et al. Experimental study on interfacial bond-slip behavior of weathering steel and seawater sea-sand concrete in corrosive marine environments[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2024, 201: 112003. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2024.112003 [5] LI X T, ZHENG J H, LIN Y H, et al. Corrosion failure analysis of interfacial bond performance in circular seawater sea-sand concrete encased weathering steel structures[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2025, 167: 108978. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108978 [6] 谷音, 戴向东, 李攀, 等. 考虑不均匀腐蚀影响的钢筋混凝土桥墩抗震性能研究[J]. 工程力学, 2022, 39(4): 113-122.GU Yin, DAI Xiang-dong, LI Pan, et al. Research on sei-smic performance of reinforced concrete bridge piers consi-dering influence of nonuniform corrosion[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2022, 39(4): 113-122. [7] 袁文厅, 齐燕军, 方庆贺. 腐蚀近海桥墩十字形双向拟静力试验及损伤分析[J]. 工程力学, 2022, 39(3): 115-125.YUAN Wen-ting, QI Yan-jun, FANG Qing-he. Cross-sha-ped bidirectional quasi-static tests and damage analysis of corroded coastal bridge piers[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2022, 39(3): 115-125. [8] 沈文都, 孙慧中. 劲性钢筋混凝土偏心受压构件正截面承载力试验研究[J]. 建筑科学, 1992, 8(4): 25-30.SHEN Wen-du, SUN Hui-zhong. Experimental study on load capacity of eccentrically compressive elements of steel reinforced concrete[J]. Building Science, 1992, 8(4): 25-30. [9] 史庆轩, 李小健, 牛荻涛. 钢筋锈蚀前后混凝土偏心受压构件承载力试验研究[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版), 1999, 31(3): 218-221.SHI Qing-xuan, LI Xiao-jian, NIU Di-tao. Tentative study on the bearing capacity of RC eccentric compressive members before and after reinforcement corrosion[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology (Natural Science Edition), 1999, 31(3): 218-221. [10] 史庆轩, 李小健, 牛荻涛, 等. 锈蚀钢筋混凝土偏心受压构件承载力试验研究[J]. 工业建筑, 2001, 31(5): 14-17.SHI Qing-xuan, LI Xiao-jian, NIU Di-tao, et al. Experi-mental study of bearing capacity of corroded reinforced con-crete eccentric compressive members[J]. Industrial Con-struction, 2001, 31(5): 14-17. [11] YUAN W T, FANG Q H, DONG Z X. Evaluation of biaxial strength deterioration for coastal bridge piers under non-uniform corrosion[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2022, 26(3): 1329-1343. doi: 10.1007/s12205-021-5969-3 [12] ZHOU H J, XU Y N, PENG Y R, et al. Partially corroded reinforced concrete piers under axial compression and cyclic loading: An experimental study[J]. Engineering Structures, 2020, 203: 109880. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109880 [13] 蒋欢军, 刘小娟. 锈蚀钢筋混凝土柱基于变形的性能指标研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2015, 36(7): 115-123.JIANG Huan-jun, LIU Xiao-juan. Study on deformation-based performance index of corroded reinforced concrete column[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2015, 36(7): 115-123. [14] 邢国华, 罗大明, 牛荻涛. 锈蚀钢筋混凝土柱的强度-变形分析模型[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2016, 36(1): 91-100.XING Guo-hua, LUO Da-ming, NIU Di-tao. Deformation capacity model of corroded reinforced concrete columns[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2016, 36(1): 91-100. [15] QIAO Q Y, DING R L, CAO W L. Axial local compressive behavior of reinforced concrete-filled stainless steel tubular column piers[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2024, 212: 108228. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.108228 [16] QIAO Q Y, YANG Z Y, CAO W L. Axial compressive be-havior of stainless steel tube confined concrete column piers[J]. Marine Structures, 2021, 78: 103021. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2021.103021 [17] LI L, CHEN J, WANG W T, et al. Experimental and pre-diction model of axial compressive responses of corroded RC cylinders strengthened with CFRP[J]. Engineering Struc-tures, 2024, 317: 118649. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118649 [18] ZAGHIAN S, MARTÍN-PÉREZ B, ALMANSOUR H. Finite element modelling of bridge piers subjected to eccentric load combined with reinforcement corrosion[J]. Engineering Structures, 2023, 283: 115822. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115822 [19] ZAGHIAN S, MARTÍN-PÉREZ B, ALMANSOUR H. Nonli-near finite element modeling of the impact of reinforcement corrosion on bridge piers under concentric loads[J]. Struc-tural Concrete, 2022, 23(1): 138-153. doi: 10.1002/suco.202100254 [20] 苑溦, 刘振亮, 宗莉娜, 等. 海洋环境下钢骨混凝土桥墩时变抗震性能分析[J]. 南京工业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2020, 42(3): 342-350.YUAN Wei, LIU Zhen-liang, ZONG Li-na, et al. Time-dependent seismic performance analysis of steel reinforced concrete bridge piers in the marine environment[J]. Journal of Nanjing Tech University: Natural Science Edition, 2020, 42(3): 342-350. [21] 李宏男, 张宇, 李钢. 考虑氯离子腐蚀作用的近海桥梁结构地震反应分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2015, 48(7): 112-122.LI Hong-nan, ZHANG Yu, LI Gang. Nonlinear seismic analysis of offshore bridges considering chloride ions corrosion effect[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 48(7): 112-122. [22] 聂莹慧, 李镜培. 氯离子环境下RC桥墩时变抗震韧性分析[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2025, 57(3): 14-24.NIE Ying-hui, LI Jing-pei. Time-dependent seismic resilience analysis of RC bridge piers in chloride service environments[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2025, 57(3): 14-24. [23] RINALDI Z, DI CARLO F, SPAGNUOLO S, et al. Influ-ence of localised corrosion on the cyclic response of reinforced concrete columns[J]. Engineering Structures, 2022, 256: 114037. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114037 [24] MARTÍN-PÉREZ B, ZIBARA H, HOOTON R D, et al. A study of the effect of chloride binding on service life pre-dictions[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2000, 30(8): 1215-1223. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00339-2 [25] 金伟良, 赵羽习. 混凝土结构耐久性研究的回顾与展望[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2002, 36(4): 371-380, 403.JIN Wei-liang, ZHAO Yu-xi. State-of-the-art on durability of concrete structures[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engi-neering Science), 2002, 36(4): 371-380, 403. [26] BIONDINI F, CAMNASIO E, PALERMO A. Lifetime seis-mic performance of concrete bridges exposed to corrosion[J]. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2014, 10(7): 880-900. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2012.761248 [27] CHOE D E, GARDONI P, ROSOWSKY D, et al. Probabi-listic capacity models and seismic fragility estimates for RC columns subject to corrosion[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2008, 93(3): 383-393. [28] DU Y G, CLARK L A, CHAN A H C. Residual capacity of corroded reinforcing bars[J]. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2005, 57(3): 135-147. doi: 10.1680/macr.2005.57.3.135 [29] 李立峰, 吴文朋, 胡思聪, 等. 考虑氯离子侵蚀的高墩桥梁时变地震易损性分析[J]. 工程力学, 2016, 33(1): 163-170.LI Li-feng, WU Wen-peng, HU Si-cong, et al. Time-dependent seismic fragility analysis of high pier bridge based on chloride ion induced corrosion[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2016, 33(1): 163-170. [30] ANDRADE C, ALONSO C, MOLINA F J. Cover cracking as a function of bar corrosion: Part Ⅰ-Experimental test[J]. Materials and Structures, 1993, 26: 453-464. doi: 10.1007/BF02472805 [31] RODRIGUEZ J, ANDRADE C. A validated user's manual for assessing the residual service life of concrete structures[R]. Madrid: DG Enterprise, 2001. [32] GB/T 50476—2019, 混凝土结构耐久性设计标准[S].GB/T 50476—2019, Standard for design of concrete struc-ture durability[S]. [33] GB 50164—2011, 混凝土质量控制标准[S].GB 50164—2011, Standard for quality control of concrete[S]. [34] BALAFAS I, BURGOYNE C J. Environmental effects on cover cracking due to corrosion[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2010, 40(9): 1429-1440. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.05.003 [35] WANG H J, ZHANG Z W, QIAN H L, et al. Galvanic corrosion induced localized defects and resulting strength reduction of circular steel tubes under axial compression: An experimental study[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2020, 154: 106881. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2020.106881 [36] GB/T 228.1—2020, 金属材料拉伸试验第1部分: 室温试验方法[S].GB/T 228.1—2020, Metallic materials—Tensile testing—Part 1: Method of test at room temperature[S]. [37] GB/T 50152—2012, 混凝土结构试验方法标准[S].GB/T 50152—2012, Standard for test method of concrete structures[S]. [38] EN 1994-1-1, Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and con-crete structures, Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings[S]. [39] JGJ 138—2016, 组合结构设计规范[S].JGJ 138—2016, Code for design of composite structures[S]. [40] AISC 2022-8-1, ANSI/AISC 360-22: Specification for struc-tural steel buildings[S]. [41] VECCHIO F J, COLLINS M P. The modified compression-field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear[J]. ACI Journal, 1986, 83(2): 219-231. [42] MANDER J B, PRIESTLEY M J N, PARK R. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete[J]. Journal of structural engineering, 1988, 114(8): 1804-1826. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804) [43] EL-TAWIL S M, DEIERLEIN G G. Fiber element analysis of composite beam-column cross-sections[R]. New York: Cornell University, 1996. [44] ZHAO X, WEN F, CHAN T M, et al. Theoretical stress-strain model for concrete in steel-reinforced concrete columns[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2019, 145(4): 04019009. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002289 -
下载: