GUO Feng-xiang, XIONG Jian, QIN Ya-qin, WAN Hua-sen. Simulation evaluation of safeguard measure for traffic safety on montane highway[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2011, 11(5): 120-126. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2011.05.019
Citation: GUO Feng-xiang, XIONG Jian, QIN Ya-qin, WAN Hua-sen. Simulation evaluation of safeguard measure for traffic safety on montane highway[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2011, 11(5): 120-126. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2011.05.019

Simulation evaluation of safeguard measure for traffic safety on montane highway

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2011.05.019
More Information
  • Author Bio:

    GUO Feng-xiang (1979-), female, lecturer, doctoral student, +86-871-3802298, gfxebox@yahoo.com.cn

    XIONG Jian (1959-), male, professor, PhD, +86-871-3802259, xjebox@163.com

  • Received Date: 2011-05-09
  • Publish Date: 2011-10-25
  • The tunnel group, climbing section and mixed traffic section of Yunnan Xiaomo Highway from K109+600 to K122+024 were selected as experiment sample sections, and their static and dynamic 3D models were established by using virtual scene generation system.Central isolation installations such as lodging warning column, visual marking, conventional marking were placed in tunnel, and additional lane was set at climbing section and mixed section.The average speeds and lateral positions of vehicles at three sample sections were comparatively analyzed, and the effects of three safety safeguard measures were evaluated.Analysis result indicates that in tunnel, the average speed standard deviations for three central isolation installations are 9.74, 10.01, 10.40 km·h-1 respectivehy, and the average lateral position standard deviations are 0.54, 0.70, 0.69 m respectivehy.It can be seen that by setting lodging warning column, the speed and lateral position of vehicle can keep well.When traffic volume is less than 1 000 pcu·h-1 at climbing section, it is beneficial to improve vehicle speed on main line by setting additional lane.When non-motor vehicle volumes are 500 and 800 pcu·h-1 at mixed traffic section, there are higher speed, smaller speed deviation and bigger lateral position after setting additional lane.Setting additional lane is beneficial to improve and maintain vehicle speed, and reduce conflicts to opposed vehicle.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    FANG Ping. Study on effect evaluation system of highway safety enhancement project[J]. Municipal Engineering Technology, 2009, 27(4): 415-418. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7767.2009.04.029
    [2]
    LIU Yao-hui, CHEN Hong. Research on safety ensuring of low-grade roads in plain area[J]. Journal of China and Foreign Highway, 2009, 29(6): 20-23. (in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWGL200906005.htm
    [3]
    WU Hua-jin. Design and implementation of operating safety ensuring model in Hengduan mountainous express way[D]. Xi an: Changan University, 2009. (in Chinese)
    [4]
    AN Ya-qin, HE Song-bai, YANG Jian-ming. Assessment of highway traffic safety guarantee based on attribute recognition theory[J]. Journal of Hebei University of Technology, 2010, 39(1): 116-118. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2373.2010.01.027
    [5]
    PREZ I. Safety impact of engineering treatments on undividedrural roads[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2006, 38(1): 192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.09.008
    [6]
    GODLEY S T. A driving simulator investigation of perceptual countermeasures to speeding[D]. Melbourne: Monash University, 1999.
    [7]
    LAURIE N E, ZHANG Shu-ping, MUNDOLI R, et al. An evaluation of alternative do not enter signs: failures of attention[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2004, 7(3): 151-166. doi: 10.1016/S1369-8478(04)00031-2
    [8]
    HORBERRY T, ANDERSONJ, REGAN M A. The possible safety benefits of enhanced road markings: a driving simulator evaluation[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2006, 9(1): 77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2005.09.002
    [9]
    CHU Xiu-min, YAN Xin-ping, ZHANG Xian-zhen, et al. Design of a virtual testing system for the visibility of roadsigns and markings[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology: Information and Management Engineering, 2005, 27(4): 135-138. (in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WHQC200504034.htm
    [10]
    ZHAO Xi, YAN Xin-ping, WU Chao-zhong. Design of roadsigns in vehicle driving simulator[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology: Transportation Science and Engineering, 2008, 31(3): 552-555. (in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JTKJ200703046.htm
    [11]
    GUO Feng-xiang, XIONG Jian, QIN Ya-qin, et al. Establishment of the 85th percentile speed forecasting model basedon driving simulation experiment[J]. Technology and Economy in Areas of Communications, 2010, 12(3): 104-107. (in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJJJ201003032.htm
    [12]
    XIONG Jian, WAN Hua-sen, GUO Feng-xiang. Freeway design consistency evaluation: a case study on driving simulator[C]∥RONG Jian, ZHONG Lian-de. Road User Behaviour with a Special Focus on Vulnerable Road Users Technical, Socialand Psychological Aspects. Beijing: ICTCT, 2007: 231-242.
    [13]
    QIN Ya-qin, XIONG Jian, GAO Jing, et al. Research on data interface for software VISSI M and the dynamic traffic flow simulation module of driving simulator[J]. Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology: Science and Technology, 2007, 32(1): 77-79. (in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSY202104062.htm
    [14]
    FITZPATRICK K, WOOLDRIDGE MD, TSI MHONI O, et al. Alternative design consistency rating methods for two-lane rural highways[R]. Washington DC: Federal Highway Administration, 2000.
    [15]
    GARBER NJ, GADIRAJU R. Factors affecting speed variance and its influence on accidents[J]. Transportation Research Record, 1989(1213): 64-71.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1821) PDF downloads(439) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return