DAI Hou-xing, WU Zhao-lin. Pre-warning system of maritime traffic safety risk in restricted visibility weather[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(5): 195-206. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.05.019
Citation: DAI Hou-xing, WU Zhao-lin. Pre-warning system of maritime traffic safety risk in restricted visibility weather[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(5): 195-206. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.05.019

Pre-warning system of maritime traffic safety risk in restricted visibility weather

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.05.019
More Information
  • Author Bio:

    DAI Hou-xing(1966-), male, senior engineer, doctoral student, capt.dai@163.com

    WU Zhao-lin(1947-), male, professor, wuzl2010@126.com

  • Received Date: 2018-06-10
  • Publish Date: 2018-10-25
  • To enhance the pre-warning applicability and accuracy of maritime traffic safety risk, a pre-warning system in restricted visibility weather of the risk was set up, and it was composed of the risk matrix knowledge base, traffic flow density prediction subsystem and visibility warning subsystem.By collecting large samples, the expert survey method was modified by using the fuzzy information distribution theory under the condition of incomplete information, and the maritime traffic risk matrix was determined.The traffic density was calculated by using the short-time prediction algorithm of traffic density based on the limit learning machine theory in the artificial neural network.The regional atmospheric model system was used to divide the visibility forecast data provided by the meteorological and marine forecasting departments into spatialtemporal fine meshes, and the visible distance was calculated.The system was used to predict the visibility distance and traffic flow density of the focused sea area with spatial grids of 2 nmile by2 nmile and time step of 10 min, so as to verify the effectiveness of the system.Simulation resultshows that at 12 time points in two different time periods, the prediction accuracy rates of visible distance are 75%, 75%, 80%, 75%, 80%, 75%, 75%, 75%, 80%, 80%, 80%and 75%.The prediction accuracy rates of corresponding traffic flow densities are up to 80%.Therefore, the forecast result is reliable, and the system can realize the visualization and intelligent monitoring of navigation risk in sea area in restricted visibility weather.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    GOERLANDT F, KUJALA P. Traffic simulation based ship collision probability modeling[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2011, 96 (1): 91-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.09.003
    [2]
    LI Wei-feng, MEI Bin, SHI Guo-you. Automatic recognition of marine traffic flow regions based on kernel density estimation[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2018, 26 (1): 84-91.
    [3]
    ZHOU Kui, WU Wei, YAO Wen-jing, et al. Highway traffic safety assessment in foggy weather[J]. Journal of Transport Science and Engineering, 2015, 31 (1): 79-84. (in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSJX201501014.htm
    [4]
    LIU Da-gang, WU Bin-gui, XIE Yi-yang, et al. Present state and development trend of maritime meteorological support service[J]. Navigation of China, 2014, 37 (1): 131-135. (in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGHH201401030.htm
    [5]
    LIU Dong-dong, SHI Guo-you, LI Wei-feng. Decision support based on optimal collision avoidance path and collision risk[C]//IEEE. IEEE 2018 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Engineering. New York: IEEE, 2018: 164-169.
    [6]
    LI Wei-feng, MA Wen-yao, YANG Jia-xuan, et al. The assessment of risk of collision between two ships avoiding collision by altering course[C]//Springer. International Conference on Algorithms and Architectures for Parallel Processing. Berlin: Springer, 2014: 507-515.
    [7]
    YIP T L. Port traffic risks-a study of accidents in Hong Kong waters[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2008, 44 (5): 921-931. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2006.09.002
    [8]
    CELIK M, LAVASANI S M, WANG Jin. A risk-based modelling approach to enhance shipping accident investigation[J]. Safety Science, 2010, 48 (1): 18-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2009.04.007
    [9]
    TRUCCO P, CAGNO E, RUGGERI F, et al. A Bayesian belief network modelling of organisational factors in risk analysis: a case study in maritime transportation[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2008, 93 (6): 845-856. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.035
    [10]
    ÖZBAS B, OR I. Analysis and control of maritime transit traffic through the Istanbul Channel: a simulation approach[J]. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 2007, 15 (3): 235-252. doi: 10.1007/s10100-007-0028-9
    [11]
    SZWED P S. Risk factors and theory building: a study to improve passenger vessel safety[J]. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 2011, 10: 183-208. doi: 10.1007/s13437-011-0010-1
    [12]
    XIE Yi-yang, LIU Da-gang, WU Dan-zhu, et al. Risk prediction technology of ship safety in the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea during severe weather[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2014, 29 (1): 136-143. (in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHXU201401025.htm
    [13]
    WU Jin-long, LIU Da-gang, FAN Zhong-zhou, et al. The risk evaluation model of major vessels in Bohai area in the condition of rough seas[J]. Navigation of China, 2012, 35 (2): 89-92. (in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGHH201202021.htm
    [14]
    FAN Zhong-zhou, LIU Da-gang, LIU Tao, et al. Dynamic display system of vessel-rough sea area based on ECDIS[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2012, 38 (3): 11-14. (in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLHS201203004.htm
    [15]
    WU Jin-long, WU Bin-gui, LIU Da-gang, et al. Safety evaluation system for anchored vessels in Tianjin anchorage under strong wind[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2013, 39 (1): 49-52. (in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLHS201301012.htm
    [16]
    SUN Cheng-zhi, DING De-wen, LIU Da-gang. Auxiliary decision-making simulation based on meteorological and hydrologic information for naval navigation security[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2014, 40 (2): 47-50. (in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLHS201402012.htm
    [17]
    LIU Da-gang, XU Dong-hua, WU Zhao-lin. Risk degree assessment model of navigating ship on heavy sea[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2005, 5 (3): 83-86, 97. (in Chinese). http://transport.gfscw.cn/article/id/200503018
    [18]
    LIU Jing, HUANG Chong-fu. An information diffusion technique for fire risk analysis[J]. Journal of Donghua University: English Edition, 2004, 21 (3): 54-57.
    [19]
    BALMAT J F, LAFONT F, MAIFRET R, et al. A decisionmaking system to maritime risk assessment[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2011, 38 (1): 171-176.
    [20]
    YU Hai, WU Qiong, FENG Xue-mei, et al. Numerical sinlulation on viscous wake field around various ships[C]∥WU You-sheng, LIU Ye, LIU Cheng, et al. Proceedings of the 23rd National Conference on Hydrodynamics and 10th National Congress on Hydrodynamics. Beijing: China Ocean Press, 2011: 594-602. (in Chinese).
    [21]
    HUANG Chong-fu. A formal model for dynamic risk analysis in natural disasters[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2015, 30 (3): 1-9. (in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHXU201503001.htm
    [22]
    XIONG Wei-qing, YAN Xiao-bo, JIANG Shou-xu, et al. Short-term traffic flow prediction based on BP neural network and fuzzy inference system[J]. Intelligent Computer and Applications, 2015, 5 (2): 43-46, 51. (in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLXZ201502013.htm
    [23]
    HE Yue, ZHANG Xiao-wei, CAI Ju-zhen, et al. Distribution characteristics of the fog derived from the MTSAT satellite data in Zhejiang Province and its adjacent sea area[J]. Acta Meterologica Sinica, 2015, 73 (1): 200-210. (in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXXB201501015.htm
    [24]
    KUJALA P, HÄNNINEN M, AROLA T, et al. Analysis of the marine traffic safety in the Gulf of Finland[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2009, 94 (8): 1349-1357.
    [25]
    HUANG Chong-fu. Exploration on the basic principles of dynamic risk analysis in natural disasters[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2015, 30 (2): 1-7. (in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHXU201502001.htm
    [26]
    HUANG Chong-fu. Multiple internet of intelligences for risk analysis[J]. Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response, 2014, 4 (2): 61-71.
    [27]
    PANG Xi-lei, HUANG Chong-fu, ZHANG Ying-ju. A basic mode for dynamic risk assessment of natural disaster[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2016, 31 (1): 1-6. (in Chinese).
    [28]
    HUANG Chong-fu. A virtual case study to analyze dynamic risks of natural disasters[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2015, 30 (4): 1-11. (in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHXU201504001.htm
    [29]
    COX L A. Confronting deep uncertainties in risk analysis[J]. Risk Analysis, 2012, 32 (10): 1607-1629.
    [30]
    ZADEH L A. The crisis of under coordination[J]. Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response, 2014, 4 (2): 59-60.
    [31]
    GAO Miao, SHI Guo-you, LI Wei-feng. Online compression algorithm of AIS trajectory data based on improved sliding window[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18 (3): 218-227. (in Chinese). http://transport.gfscw.cn/article/id/201803022

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2114) PDF downloads(555) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return