Volume 23 Issue 4
Aug.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
XU Jing-min, XU Cheng-hua, SHI Ye-hui, ZHANG Ding-wen, XU Tao, XU Wen, CHENG He-lan. Responses of loose sand ground and surface structure caused by tunnel construction[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2023, 23(4): 190-204. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2023.04.014
Citation: XU Jing-min, XU Cheng-hua, SHI Ye-hui, ZHANG Ding-wen, XU Tao, XU Wen, CHENG He-lan. Responses of loose sand ground and surface structure caused by tunnel construction[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2023, 23(4): 190-204. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2023.04.014

Responses of loose sand ground and surface structure caused by tunnel construction

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2023.04.014
Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52108364

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52278398

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2242022R10086

Open Fund Research Ptoject of Tunnel and Underground Engineering Research Center of Jiangsu Province 2021-SDJJ-03

More Information
  • Author Bio:

    XU Jing-min (1992-), male, assistant professor, PhD, jingmin_xu@seu.edu.cn

  • Received Date: 2023-02-14
  • Publish Date: 2023-08-25
  • Four centrifuge tests were performed to simulate the construction of tunnels with the relative depths (burial depth-diameter ratio) of 1.3 and 2.0 in the sand ground, and the migration and deformation laws of soil layers and ground buildings were analyzed. The ground volume loss caused by tunnel construction was modelled by extracting the liquid from the model tunnel, and a two-storey aluminum frame structure model was designed. The movement data of the strata and structure caused by tunnel construction were measured by particle image velocimetry (PIV), and the horizontal and vertical displacements of the surface and building raft foundation, the movement and shear deformation of the deep ground, the shear deformation and classification of the frame structure, as well as the shear deformation modification factor of the building and relative shear stiffness were analyzed. Research results show that the surface settlement trough width increases from 3.4 m to 5.6 m when tunnel relative depth increases from 1.3 to 2.0, and the maximum settlement of ground building increases from 32.3 mm to 49.5 mm, but the deformation degree decreases. The deformation of ground frame structure due to tunnel construction mainly exhibits shear deformation, and the proportion of bending deformation is negligible. The contractive deformation of loose sand soil due to tunnel construction leads to the fact that the volume loss of surface ground is always greater than the tunnel, and a deeper tunnel indicates a greater difference. A large gap (27 mm) exists between the building raft foundation and the ground in the shallow tunnel test, whereas no gap forms in the deep tunnel test, thereby increasing the constraint of the building raft foundation on the horizontal movement of the surface soil. The building shear deformation modification factor decreases gradually with the increase in tunnel volume loss, and the change rate of shallow tunnel is greater. The data of building shear deformation modification factor-relative shear stiffness for the two relative tunnel depths are within the existing empirical envelopes, indicating that the shear deformation modification factor is also applicable to the deep tunnel.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    PECK R B. Deep excavations and tunnelling in soft ground[C]// ISSMGE. International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. London: ISSMGE, 1969: 311-375.
    [2]
    LAI Hong-peng, ZHAO Xin, KANG Zuo. Settlement control standard of existing metro line undercrossed by new metro tunnel in loess area[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(4): 63-71. (in Chinese) doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2018.04.007
    [3]
    ZHANG Zhi-guo, SHEN An-xin, XU Chen, et al. Analytical solution for surface consolidation settlements induced by shield tunneling with semi-permeable boundary conditions under train loading in viscous field[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 35(5): 116-127. (in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL202205011.htm
    [4]
    LAI Hong-peng, YAO Yi, GAO Qiang, et al. Elastoplastic solution of ground deformation caused by shallow tunnel in bipolar coordinate system[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2023, 23(4): 178-189. (in Chinese) doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2023.04.013
    [5]
    FANG Qian, DU Jian-ming, WANG Zhong-ju, et al. Model experimental study on stratum deformation of shield tunnelling in sand[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2021, 34(5): 135-143, 214. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2021.05.013
    [6]
    FANG Qian, DU Jian-ming, WANG Gan, et al. Stratum deformation laws and influence factors analysis of tunnel excavation in sand[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2020, 2(3): 67-76. (in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDZH202003009.htm
    [7]
    ZHENG G, GE L, ZHANG T, et al. Volumetric behaviour of subsurface ground due to tunnelling in completely drained granular soil[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2019, 116: 103217. doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103217
    [8]
    CAO Li-qiang, ZHANG Ding-li, FANG Qian, et al. Ground vertical displacements due to shield tunnelling in double-layer soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38(3): 634-648. (in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201903019.htm
    [9]
    TONG Jian-jun, GUI Deng-bin, WANG Li, et al. Research on control criteria of shield tunnel crown settlement based on safety of overlying airport runway[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2021, 40(2): 382-389. (in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX202102013.htm
    [10]
    POTTS D M, ADDENBROOKE T I. A structure's influence on tunnelling-induced ground movements[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Geotechnical Engineering, 1997, 125: 109-125. doi: 10.1680/igeng.1997.29233
    [11]
    SU Jie, ZHANG Ding-li, ZHOU Zheng-yu, et al. Safety risk assessment and control of existing bridge crossed by tunnel construction[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(S1): 3188-3195. (in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2015S1073.htm
    [12]
    ZHANG Zhi-guo, SHI Min-zhi, ZHANG Cheng-ping, et al. Research on deformation of adjacent underground pipelines caused by excavation of quasi-rectangular shields[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38(4): 852-864. (in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201904021.htm
    [13]
    WU Feng-bo, JIN Huai, SHANG Yan-jun, et al. Study of building/structure settlement prediction method surrounding urban rail transit tunnel engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(S2): 3535-3544. (in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX2013S2069.htm
    [14]
    TAN Wei-zi. Case study of overlapped shield tunnels passing buildings in very close proximity[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2021, 17(S1): 291-298. (in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BASE2021S1041.htm
    [15]
    WU Yi-min, LIU Yan-an, WANG Heng, et al. Regression analysis of influence law of urban pavement settlement caused by underpass tunnel construction in Beijing[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2022, 22(2): 176-186. (in Chinese) doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.02.013
    [16]
    MARSHALL A M, FARRELL R, KLAR A, et al. Tunnels in sands: the effect of size, depth and volume loss on greenfield displacements[J]. Géotechnique, 2012, 62(5): 385-399.
    [17]
    MAIR R J, TAYLOR R N, BRACEGIRDLE A. Subsurface settlement profiles above tunnels in clays[J]. Géotechnique, 1993, 43(2): 315-320.
    [18]
    FRANZA A, MARSHALL A M, ZHOU B. Greenfield tunnelling in sands: the effects of soil density and relative depth[J]. Géotechnique, 2019, 69(4): 297-307.
    [19]
    MA Qian-ying, YE Jia-chao, JIANG Xiao-hui. Study on ground settlement prediction in shield tunnel construction considering soil arching effect[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2021, 58(6): 148-154. (in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDSD202106017.htm
    [20]
    ZHANG Kun-yong, CHEN Shu, WANG Yao. Numerical simulation and normalized model of surface settlement induced by shield tunneling excavation[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2019, 15(3): 842-849. (in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BASE201903026.htm
    [21]
    DAI Jun, JIA Qiang. Study on adjacent buildings ground settlement caused by shield tunneling construction[J]. Journal of Shandong Jianzhu University, 2019, 34(5): 44-49, 59. (in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDJG201905008.htm
    [22]
    ZHANG Zhi-guo, LI Zhen-bo, ZHANG Meng-xi, et al. Analysis on deformation of tower with large chassis considering interaction between tunnel excavation and pile foundation[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 51(4): 603-609. (in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DNDX202104008.htm
    [23]
    DAI Xu, ZHAO Shao-fei, SUN Song, et al. Influence on deformations of a ground frame structure by a tunnel crossing at different distances[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2018, 38(3): 480-486, 497. (in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXK201803011.htm
    [24]
    XU J M, FRANZA A, MARSHALL A M. Centrifuge modelling study of the effect of tunnel depth on tunnel-footing interaction[C]//NUS. Asian Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics (Asiafuge-2021). Singapore: NUS, 2021: 247-256.
    [25]
    ZHANG Yu-ting, AN Xiao-yu, JIN Ya-fei. Centrifugal model tests on settlement of structures caused by tunnel excavation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(S2): 54-57. (in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2022S2012.htm
    [26]
    FARRELL R P. Tunnelling in sands and the response of buildings[D]. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, 2010.
    [27]
    XU Jing-min, ZHANG Ding-wen, LIU Song-yu. Tunneling-induced sandy ground deformation affected by surface framed structures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(4): 602-612. (in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC202204002.htm
    [28]
    WHITE D J, TAKE W A, BOLTON M D. Soil deformation measurement using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and photogrammetry[J]. Géotechnique, 2003, 53(7): 619-631.
    [29]
    XU J M, FRANZA A, MARSHALL A M. Response of framed buildings on raft foundations to tunneling[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2020, 146(11): 04020120.
    [30]
    COOK D A. Studies of settlement and crack damage in old and new facades[C]//International Masonry Society. Proceedings of the 3rd International Masonry Conference. London: International Masonry Society, 1992: 203-211.
    [31]
    BOSCARDIN M D, CORDING E J. Building response to excavation- induced settlement[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1989, 115(1): 1-21.
    [32]
    ZHAO Y Y. In situ soil testing for foundation performance prediction[D]. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, 2008.
    [33]
    BOLDINI D, LOSACCO N, FRANZA A, et al. Tunneling-induced deformation of bare frame structures on sand: numerical study of building deformations[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2021, 147: 04021116.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1841) PDF downloads(114) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return