Volume 25 Issue 2
Apr.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
HUANG Zun-di, TAN Meng-cheng, XU Zhen-guo, CHANG Ning, FU Cheng. Wind tunnel test study on shock wave characteristics of low-vacuum tube train[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(2): 108-117. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.02.007
Citation: HUANG Zun-di, TAN Meng-cheng, XU Zhen-guo, CHANG Ning, FU Cheng. Wind tunnel test study on shock wave characteristics of low-vacuum tube train[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(2): 108-117. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.02.007

Wind tunnel test study on shock wave characteristics of low-vacuum tube train

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.02.007
Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52002290

Science and Technology Project of China Communications and Transportation Association 202310

Jiangmen Science and Technology Plan Project 2220002000147

Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program Project for College Students of Wuyi University 202311349030

Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program Project for College Students of Wuyi University S202311349106

More Information
  • Corresponding author: CHANG Ning (1984-), female, associate professor, wydxcn@163.com
  • Received Date: 2024-02-26
  • Publish Date: 2025-04-28
  • To investigate the challenges faced by high-speed trains operating within low-vacuum tubes, particularly the generation of shock waves, wind tunnel tests were conducted using a magnetic levitation (maglev) train model. These tests identified the Mach number at which shock waves first appear in the flow field of tube train, as well as the positions and characteristics of the shock waves at various Mach numbers. The flow field of tube train in the wind tunnel was captured by using the schlieren system, and the interaction mechanism and shock wave characteristics between the tube train and the surrounding air were deeply explored. The actual operation of the tube train was simulated by using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method, and the shock wave characteristics of the wind tunnel test results and numerical calculation results were analyzed. Research results indicate that for a blockage ratio of 0.112, no shock waves occurred in the flow field of tube train when the Mach numbers were 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7. When Mach number is 0.8, shock waves first appeared in the flow field at two distinct locations: near the train shoulder and in the wake region. At the front of the train, flow separation occurs, and the airflow flows along the front of the train through the tube and the middle of the train. The cross-sectional area decreases, the Mach number increases, and a sonic line forms near the shoulder. Downstream of this sonic line, a rapid increase in gas density and pressure leads to shock wave generation. As the airflow continues through the transition between the train body and the tail, the cross-sectional area increases, the Mach number continues to rise, and flow separation occurs near the rear. The flow velocity decreases to sonic speed, resulting in a shock wave due to the sudden increase in gas density and pressure. The numerical calculation cloud map revealed the spatial distribution characteristics of the shock wave and the evolution law of flow separation. The shock wave locations in both at the train shoulder and in the wake, agreed well with the schlieren images from the wind tunnel experiments, confirming that the critical Mach number for shock wave generation is 0.8.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    HOU Zi-hao, MAO Kai, ZHU Yu-jian, et al. Progresses in key aerodynamic problems of low-vacuum tube trains[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2024, 42(2): 1-20.
    [2]
    SCHETZ J A. Aerodynamics of high-speed trains[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2001, 33: 371-414. doi: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.33.1.371
    [3]
    KOU Jie, FU Cheng, GAO Xing-long, et al. Progress on fluid-solid coupling of vacuum pipeline train and analysis of key technology[J]. Experimental Fluid Mechanics, 2023, 37(3): 37-49.
    [4]
    KIM T K, KIM K H, KWON H B. Aerodynamic characteristics of a tube train[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2011, 99(12): 1187-1196. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2011.09.001
    [5]
    KIM D W, KIM T H, KIM H D. A study on characteristics of shock train inside a shock tube[J]. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, 2017, 7(6): 366-371. doi: 10.1016/j.taml.2017.09.005
    [6]
    ZHOU P, ZHANG J Y, LI T, et al. Numerical study on wave phenomena produced by the super high-speed evacuated tube maglev train[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2019, 190: 61-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2019.04.003
    [7]
    ZHOU P, ZHANG J Y. Aerothermal mechanisms induced by the super high-speed evacuated tube maglev train[J]. Vacuum, 2020, 173: 109142. doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2019.109142
    [8]
    ZHANG Xiao-han, LI Tian, ZHANG Ji-ye, et al. Aerodynamic choked flow and shock wave phenomena of subsonic evacuated tube train[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 57(4): 182-190.
    [9]
    ZHANG Yin-long, WANG Xiao-fei, ZHANG Kun, et al. Aerothermal characteristics of maglev transportation in evacuated tube with different blocking ratios[J]. Chinese Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, 2022, 42(5): 394-403.
    [10]
    SONG Jia-yuan, LI Tian, ZHANG Ji-ye, et al. Effect of tube cross-section shape on aerodynamic characteristics of subsonic evacuated tube maglev system[J]. Vacuum, 2022, 59(1): 7-12.
    [11]
    ZHOU Peng, LI Tian, ZHANG Ji-ye, et al. Aerothermal effect generated by hyper train in the evacuated tube[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 56(8): 190-199.
    [12]
    ZHANG Jun-bo, LI Hong-mei, WANG Jun-biao, et al. Simulation analysis and research on thermal effect of maglev train in low vacuum tube[J]. China Railway, 2020(11): 100-106.
    [13]
    HU Xiao, MA Tian-hao, WANG Xiao-fei, et al. Scale effect of aerodynamic characteristics in evacuated tube maglev transport[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2023, 58(4): 808-819.
    [14]
    HUANG Zun-di, YI Yan-yan, CHANG Ning. Analysis on shock wave characteristics of supersonic train running in tube[J]. Vacuum, 2022, 59(5): 55-62.
    [15]
    LIU Chao, WU Hao, QU Shi-rong. et al. Research of vertical section parameters of 1 000 km/h vacuum tube maglev[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2023, 40(9): 116-121.
    [16]
    SONG Jia-yuan, LI Tian, ZHANG Ji-ye, et al. Research on aerodynamic characteristics of evacuated tube train in dynamic operation[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2023, 37(1): 64-71.
    [17]
    WANG Xiao-fei, HU Xiao, LI Zong-peng, et al. The effect of track structure on the aerodynamic characteristics of evacuated tube maglev train[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2023, 37(3): 9-18.
    [18]
    HUANG Zhi-xiang, CHEN Li, ZHANG Wei-zhuo. Study on simulation manner of wind tunnel test of high-speed train model[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2013, 10(3): 87-93.
    [19]
    HUANG Zhi-xiang, CHEN Li, JIANG Ke-lin, et al. The analysis of effect factors on wind tunnel testing data of high-speed train model[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2016, 38(7): 34-39.
    [20]
    ZHANG Zai-zhong, ZHOU Dan. Wind tunnel experiment on aerodynamic characteristic of streamline head of high speed train with different head shapes[J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2013, 44(6): 2603-2608.
    [21]
    LI Kun, LIANG Xi-feng, YANG Ming-zhi. Anti-wind aerodynamic performance of high-speed train and wind-break wall optimization[J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2018, 49(5): 1297-1305.
    [22]
    TELENTA M, DUHOVNIK J, KOSEL F, et al. Numerical and experimental study of the flow through a geometrically accurate porous wind barrier model[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2014, 124(1): 99-108.
    [23]
    WANG M, LI X Z, XIAO J, et al. An experimental analysis of the aerodynamic characteristics of a high-speed train on a bridge under crosswinds[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018, 177: 92-100.
    [24]
    LYU Qian-qian. Model experimental research on the temperature stress of low vacuum pipeline structure[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2022, 39(1): 18-24, 72.
    [25]
    HUANG He-xia. Behaviors of shock train in isolator with background shocks and its control[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017.
    [26]
    HUANG He-xia, TAN Hui-jun, ZHUANG Yi, et al. Progress in internal flow characteristics of hypersonic inlet/ isolator[J]. Propulsion Technology, 2018, 39(10): 2252-2273.
    [27]
    CAO Xue-bin. Research on flow characteristics and control rules of rectangular isolators[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2011.
    [28]
    CAO Xue-bin, ZHU Shou-mei, MAN Yan-jin, et al. Direction connect test on isolator considering effects of nonuniform flow at inlet throat[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2015, 36(4): 547-555.
    [29]
    CHEN Zhi. Experimental study of the scramjet engine isolator flow and its flow control mechanism[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2015.
    [30]
    YI Shi-he, CHEN Zhi. Review of recent experimental studies of the shock train flow field in the isolator[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(19): 199401.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1029) PDF downloads(99) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return