Volume 25 Issue 2
Apr.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Ling-bo, GUO Xin-jun, ZHAO Peng, ZHU Cheng-long. Multi-objective optimization algorithm for upper stiffened double-deck steel truss girder bridge based on response surface[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(2): 252-269. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.02.016
Citation: WANG Ling-bo, GUO Xin-jun, ZHAO Peng, ZHU Cheng-long. Multi-objective optimization algorithm for upper stiffened double-deck steel truss girder bridge based on response surface[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(2): 252-269. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.02.016

Multi-objective optimization algorithm for upper stiffened double-deck steel truss girder bridge based on response surface

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.02.016
Funds:

National Key R & D Program of China 2021YFB1600305

Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province 2022JC-23

Innovation Capability Support Program of Shaanxi Province 2023-CX-TD-38

More Information
  • Corresponding author: WANG Ling-bo (1984-), female, associate professor, PhD, wanglingbo@gfscw.cn
  • Received Date: 2023-09-23
  • Publish Date: 2025-04-28
  • To optimize the design parameters of the upper stiffened double-deck steel truss girder bridge to ensure structural safety and reduce the engineering workload of the superstructure, an improved AdaDelta algorithm based on the response surface method suitable for multi-objective optimization was proposed. Based on a bridge serving both highways and railways, a multi-scale hybrid element model was established for the initial design parameters, and its calculation accuracy was validated. Based on the structural and mechanical characteristics of the bridge, the height of the upper and lower chords, the height of the truss, the maximum length of the stiffened vertical rods, and the thickness of the bridge deck were selected as the structural parameters to be optimized. In addition, the mid-span live load deflection, the maximum tensile stress of stiffened chords, the maximum bending stress of the bridge deck, the maximum compressive stress of lower chords at the top section of piers, the maximum stabilizing compressive stress of web rods, and the engineering workload of the superstructure were selected as the objective functions. A set of response surface fitting equations reflecting the nonlinear relationships between the parameters to be optimized and the objective functions was established. The improved AdaDelta algorithm was applied to optimize the design parameters of the upper stiffened double-deck steel truss girder bridge and compared with the optimization results of PSO and NSGA-Ⅲ. Analysis results show that the response surface method can accurately fit the numerical relationship between the parameters to be optimized and the target response function. The lightweight equation can achieve a fitting accuracy exceeding 97% and a variation coefficient below 1%. This approach significantly enhances computational efficiency while maintaining accuracy. The improved AdaDelta algorithm retains the fast convergence speed and low fluctuation characteristic of the traditional AdaDelta algorithm. By introducing a dual-weight control criterion based on satisfaction and importance, the optimization results become more targeted and applicable for engineering projects. The multi-objective optimization satisfaction results can be improved by an average of 6%. After the optimization of design parameters, the structural internal forces are redistributed. The mid-span live load deflection, the maximum tensile stress of stiffened chords, and the maximum bending stress of the bridge deck increase by 10.37%, 4.65%, and 4.99%, respectively. The maximum compressive stress of the lower chord at the top section of piers and the maximum stabilizing compressive stress of web rods decrease by 0.86% and 4.34%, respectively, and the engineering workload of the superstructure decreases by 4.11%. The project cost is greatly reduced under the premise of ensuring structural safety. The proposed algorithm is efficient and user-friendly. The weights can be flexibly adjusted according to specific optimization requirements to achieve design decisions oriented toward different goals. It is suitable for application in the optimization design practice of bridges in other systems.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    ZHENG Kai-feng, FENG Xiao-yang, HENG Jun-lin, et al. State-of-the-art review of steel bridges in 2020[J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering (Chinese and English), 2021, 43(S1): 53-69.
    [2]
    CHENG Jin, XU Ming-sai, XU Hang. Mechanical performance analysis and parametric study of double-deck plate-truss composite steel girders of a three-tower four-span suspension bridge[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 199: 109648. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109648
    [3]
    DING H S, FANG J, ZHANG L S, et al. A construction technique of incremental launching for a continuous steel truss girder bridge with suspension cable stiffening chords[J]. Structural Engineering International, 2021, 31 (1): 93-98. doi: 10.1080/10168664.2019.1705224
    [4]
    WANG Zuo-cai, DING Ya-jie, GE Bi, et al. Review on nonlinear model updating for bridge structures[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2022, 22(2): 59-75. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.02.004
    [5]
    YE Dan, XU Zhe, LIU Yang-qing. Solution to the problem of bridge structure damage identification by a response surface method and an imperialist competitive algorithm[J]. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12: 16495. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17457-9
    [6]
    FANG Shu-jun. Damage detection of long-span bridge structures based on response surface model[J]. Thermal Science, 2020, 24(3): 1497-1504.
    [7]
    LI Fei, LIU Yi-kang, YANG Jian. Durability assessment method of hollow thin-walled bridge piers under rockfall impact based on damage response surface[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14: 1-24.
    [8]
    MIAO C Q, ZHUANG M L, DONG B. Stress corrosion of bridge cable wire by the response surface method[J]. Strength of Materials, 2019, 51(4): 646-652. doi: 10.1007/s11223-019-00111-7
    [9]
    HU Si-cong, CHEN Bao-kui, SONG Gu-quan, et al. Resilience- based seismic design optimization of highway RC bridges by response surface method and improved non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2022, 20(1): 449-476. doi: 10.1007/s10518-021-01232-8
    [10]
    LI Hui-hui, LI Li-feng, WU Wen-peng, et al. Seismic fragility assessment framework for highway bridges based on an improved uniform design-response surface model methodology[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 18(5): 2329-2353. doi: 10.1007/s10518-019-00783-1
    [11]
    LI Li-feng, LI Ming-hua, HU Rui. Parametric optimization of viscous damper for large-span cable-stayed bridge based on vulnerability[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2023, 42(23): 87-94, 102, 208-218.
    [12]
    GOU Hong-ye, PENG Ye, LI Liang, et al. Running safety of hybrid rigid frame railway bridge with double-deck combined steel truss during earthquakes[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2022, 22(6): 193-206. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.06.013
    [13]
    MA Yin-ping, LIU Yong-jian, LIU Jiang. Multi-scale finite element model updating of CFST composite truss bridge based on response surface method[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2019, 32(11): 51-61.
    [14]
    JI Wei, SHAO Tian-yan. Finite element model updating for improved box girder bridges with corrugated steel webs using the response surface method and fmincon algorithm[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2021, 25(2): 586-602. doi: 10.1007/s12205-020-0591-3
    [15]
    LI Yan-qiang, LIU Xiao-hui, CHEN Ze-lin, et al. Updating of cable-stayed bridge model based on cable force response surface method[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2021, 43(2): 168-174.
    [16]
    SUN Yun. Research on updation of suspension bridge model of steel-concrete composite based on response surface[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 2020.
    [17]
    XU Shi-zhan, LI Yang, FENG Guan-jie, et al. Model updating of bridge segment parameter based on response surface method[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2022, 19(6): 1658-1665.
    [18]
    ZHANG Li-ye, WANG Bo, WANG Bing-jian, et al. A method for modifying dynamic model of cable-stayed bridge based on response surface method[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2022, 39(8): 46-52, 61.
    [19]
    MA Shan-liang, ZHANG Zeng-qi, LIU Xiao-ming, et al. Reuse of red mud in magnesium potassium phosphate cement: reaction mechanism and performance optimization[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 61: 105290. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105290
    [20]
    DUAN Li, LI Yuan-song, GONG Guo-feng, et al. Parameter error identification of cable-stayed bridge based on the response surface method[J]. Journal of Municipal Technology, 2019, 37(3): 81-84, 88.
    [21]
    ZHAN Yu-lin, HUANG Yuan-yuan, FAN Zi-hao, et al. Sensitivity analysis of asymmetric steel truss cable-stayed bridge based on response surface method[J]. Railway Engineering, 2023, 63(10): 62-68.
    [22]
    ZHAN Yu-lin, HOU Zhi-yao, SHAO Jun-hu, et al. Cable force optimization of irregular cable-stayed bridge based on response surface method and particle swarm optimization algorithm[J]. Bridge Construction, 2022, 52(3): 16-23.
    [23]
    WANG Da, ZHOU Wang, LI Mao-nong. Research on weight asymmetry alignment correction of long-span concrete cable-stayed bridge girder based on response surface method[J]. Highways & Automotive Applications, 2022(2): 94-96.
    [24]
    WANG Ling-bo, XI Rong-jie, GUO Xin-jun, et al. The structural design and optimization of top-stiffened double-layer steel truss bridges based on the response surface method and particle swarm optimization[J]. Applied Sciences, 2023, 13: 11033.
    [25]
    TANG Zhong-guo, LI Bei-an, LIU Xiang, et al. Optimization design of simply supported UHPC beam bridges based on improved particle swarm optimization algorithm[J]. Journal of Guangxi University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 48(3): 558-570.
    [26]
    LI Qi-yang, ZHOU Li-ming. Multistrategy cooperation particle swarm optimization for fem model update of the continuous warren truss steel railway bridge[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2023, 2023: 9806200.
    [27]
    TU Bing, LIU Lai-hui, DENG Nian-chun, et al. Multi-objective optimization of long-span CFST trussed arch rib based on genetic algorithm[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2021, 38(12): 56-63, 72.
    [28]
    LI Li-feng, HOU Kun, ZOU De-qiang, et al. Optimization of section layout of steel plate composite beam with medium span[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2024, 58(3): 510-517.
    [29]
    KORUS K, SALAMAK M, JASINSKI M. Optimization of geometric parameters of arch bridges using visual programming fem components and genetic algorithm[J]. Engineering Structures, 2021, 241: 112465.
    [30]
    LI Hong-ya, PENG Yu-zhong, DENG Chu-yan, et al. Review of hybrids of GA and PSO[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2018, 54(2): 20-28, 39.
    [31]
    CAO Tong, BAI Yan-ping. Study on the prediction of air quality based on LSTM with gradient descent optimization[J]. Journal of Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, 2020, 38(6): 159-164.
    [32]
    CHANG Yong-hu, LI Hu-yang. Comparison of gradient based optimization algorithms[J]. Modern Computer, 2019(17): 3-8, 15.
    [33]
    LIU Qin, YANG Zuan, WANG Lei. Design of steel truss girder of main bridge of Niutianyang Bridge[J]. Bridge Construction, 2023, 53(2): 98-104.
    [34]
    ZHENG Ya-peng. Research on key technology of steel truss composite beam in standard section of Daoqingzhou Bridge[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2022, 66(6): 68-73.
    [35]
    FENG Ya-cheng, ZHANG Xiao-kun, CHEN Ying-tao, et al. Overall design of Yellow River highway-railway combined super large bridge of Ji'nan-Binzhou Railway[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2022, 39(12): 60-65.
    [36]
    PENG Zhen-hua. Study on crucial technique of three main trusses steel bridge with rigid cable[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2007.
    [37]
    SU Jian-nan, WANG Feng-hua. Brief introduction to design of Zengjiayan Jialing River Bridge of Chongqing[J]. Technology of Highway and Transport, 2016, 32(6): 38-42.
    [38]
    XIE Lan-bo, KANG Jin, LIU Han-shun. Design of steel girders for main bridge of Pengbu Bridge in Hangzhou[J]. Bridge Construction, 2023, 53(4): 116-122.
    [39]
    FENG Pei, LI Feng-qin. Study on structure type of main span of Jinan Yellow River Highway-Railway Combined Bridge[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2010, 27(8): 67-72.
    [40]
    YU Jun-jie, ZHOU Cheng. Research on seismic design of multipurpose continuous steel truss girder bridge stiffened with rigid cables[J]. World Bridges, 2023, 51(S1): 117-124.
    [41]
    SONG Fa-bao, ZHU Yong-jun, KANG Jin, et al. Overall design of Qiantang River Rail-cum-Road Bridge[J]. Bridge Construction, 2020, 50(3): 92-97.
    [42]
    LIU Yuan. Research on the influence of size parameter and section form on the stress of orthotropic steel deck slab[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2018.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1631) PDF downloads(107) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return