Volume 25 Issue 3
Jun.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHOU Mi, LI Zhi-xuan, FENG Peng-fei. Long-period design response spectrum study of ultra-long-span suspension bridges[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(3): 144-159. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.03.009
Citation: ZHOU Mi, LI Zhi-xuan, FENG Peng-fei. Long-period design response spectrum study of ultra-long-span suspension bridges[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(3): 144-159. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.03.009

Long-period design response spectrum study of ultra-long-span suspension bridges

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.03.009
Funds:

National Key R&D Program of China 2021YFB1600300

National Natural Science Foundation of China 51978062

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 300102212209

  • Received Date: 2023-12-04
  • Accepted Date: 2024-09-12
  • Rev Recd Date: 2024-07-18
  • Publish Date: 2025-06-28
  • To establish the long-period design response spectrum suitable for the seismic design of ultra-long-span suspension bridges, 17 574 measured ground motion records were collected from the strong earthquake databases of China, Japan, and the United States. By correcting, filtering, and analyzing the spectral characteristics of the collected records, a standard and method for defining the conventional ground motion and the long-period ground motion were proposed. Then, 1 084 long-period ground motions were selected by this method.A "four-segment" standardized response spectrum mathematical model was used to fit the average amplitude of the long-period ground motions. The model parameters were calibrated by a genetic algorithm, the long-period design response spectra for different engineering sites were established. An ultra-long-span suspension bridge with a main span of 2 300 m was taken as the support project, the rationality of the proposed spectrum was verified by analyzing the structural response caused by the safety evaluation response spectrum and the long-period design response spectrum.Analysis results show that the average period of the acceleration response spectrum in the range of 0.02-10.00 s is no less than 1.5 s, which can be used as an important criterion with the less-than-1Hz main frequency component of the Fourier spectrum to define the conventional ground motion and the long-period ground motion.Compared with the standard response spectrum, the proposed long-period design response spectra can take the effect of long-period ground motion into more comprehensive consideration. Under E1 earthquake action, the seismic response difference ratio at the key position of the bridge tower in the support project, caused by the long-period design response spectrum and the safety assessment response spectrum, is 1.4%-42.4% while the difference ratio is 0.3%-19.3% under E2 earthquake action. Additionally, under the long-period design response spectrum, the seismic responses of the bridge tower and the stiffened beam are greater than that corresponding to the safety assessment response spectrum. For an ultra-long-span suspension bridge, where key load-bearing components need to maintain elasticity under E2 earthquake action, the proposed long-period design response spectrum can rationally guide its seismic design.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    HAN Xiao-lei, YOU Tao, JI Jing. Descending law in long-period range for an acceleration response spectrum[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2018, 37(9): 86-91, 105.
    [2]
    HUANG Lin, LIAO Hai-li, WANG Qi, et al. Flutter stability optimization of a 2 300 m super long-span flat steel box girder suspension bridge[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2022, 41(14): 210-217.
    [3]
    WANG Mao-qiang, WU Ling-zheng, YANG Huai-mao. Analysis of seismic effect on the cable system of 2 000 m suspension bridge with single side juxtaposed double cable[J]. Highway, 2022, 67(9): 176-183.
    [4]
    KATSUCHI H, JONES N P, SCANLAN R H, et al. Multi-mode flutter and buffeting analysis of the Akashi-Kaikyo Bridge[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1998, 77: 431-441.
    [5]
    XIAO Hai-zhu, ZHANG Xiao-yong, XU Gong-yi. Study of static and dynamic property of main bridge of Yangsigang Changjiang River Bridge in Wuhan[J]. World Bridges, 2019, 47(6): 70-73.
    [6]
    DING Ye-jun, ZHAO Lin, XIAN Rong, et al. Evolution law of aerodynamic stability of long-span suspension bridges with increasing spans[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2023, 40(12): 194-202.
    [7]
    KOKETSU K, MIYAKE H. A seismological overview of long-period ground motion[J]. Journal of Seismology, 2008, 12(2): 133-143.
    [8]
    FURUMURA T, HAYAKAWA T. Anomalous propagation of long-period ground motions recorded in Tokyo during the 23 October 2004 Mw 6.6 Niigata-Ken Chuetsu, Japan, Earthquake[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2007, 97(3): 863-880.
    [9]
    CHUNG Y L, NAGAE T, HITAKA T, et al. Seismic resistance capacity of high-rise buildings subjected to long-period ground motions: e-defense shaking table test[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2010, 136(6): 637-644.
    [10]
    XIE Li-li, ZHOU Yong-nian, HU Cheng-xiang, et al. Characteristics of response spectra of longperiod earthquake ground motion[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 1990, 10(1): 1-20.
    [11]
    WANG Ya-yong, WANG Li, LIU Xiao-di. Study on long-period seismic design response spectra with different damping ratios[J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting, 1990(1): 38-41, 37.
    [12]
    WENG Da-gen, XU Zhi-xin. Study on seismic design response spectra in Shanghai area[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 1993, 21(1): 9-16.
    [13]
    YU Yan-xiang, HU Yu-xian. Discussion on the long-period design spectrum in "Aseismic Design Code for Buildings" of Shanghai[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2000, 20(1): 27-34.
    [14]
    LI Chun-feng, ZHANG Yang, ZHAO Jin-bao, et al. Long-period ground motion characteristic of the 1999 Jiji(Chi-Chi), Taiwan, mainshock and aftershcoks[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2006, 28(4): 417-428, 450.
    [15]
    FANG Xiao-dan, WEI Lian, ZHOU Jing. Characteristics of earthquake response for long-period structures and response spectrum[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2014, 35(3): 16-23.
    [16]
    LI Heng, LI Long-an, FENG Qian. Seismic design spectra in long-period from spectral displacement analyses[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2012, 32(4): 47-53.
    [17]
    GENG Shu-wei, TAO Xia-xin, WANG Guo-xin. Study on the provisions for the values of design response spectra in long period section[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2008, 24(2): 111-116.
    [18]
    ZHOU Yong-nian, ZHOU Zheng-hua, YU Hai-ying. A study on long period portion of design spectra[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2004, 24(2): 15-18.
    [19]
    CAO Jia-liang, SHI Wei-xing, LIU Wen-guang, et al. Relative displacement response spectrum of a long-period structure[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2011, 30(7): 63-70.
    [20]
    CHEN Xian-cai. Study on the design response spectrum of long-period ground motion and the method of ground motion selection[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2020.
    [21]
    QIU Li-shan. Research on design spectrum of far-sourse long-period ground motion based on seismic records from 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake, China[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2016.
    [22]
    PAOLUCCI R, ROVELLI A, FACCIOLI E, et al. On the reliability of long-period response spectral ordinates from digital accelerograms[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2008, 37(5): 697-710.
    [23]
    LV Hong-shan, ZHAO Feng-xin. Site coefficients suitable to China site category[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2007, 29(1): 67-76, 114.
    [24]
    ZHOU Xi-yuan, WANG Guang-jun, SU Jing-yu. The influence of magnitude and epicentral distance on the characteristics of ground motion spectrum under the same intensity[J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting, 1983, 5(S1): 49-55.
    [25]
    BOORE D M, BOMMER J J. Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2005, 25(2): 93-115.
    [26]
    WHITNEY R. Ground motion processing and observations for the near-field accelerograms from the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal earthquake[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 107: 250-263.
    [27]
    DOUGLAS J, BOORE D M. High-frequency filtering of strong-motion records[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 9(2): 395-409.
    [28]
    BOORE D M, STEPHENS C D, JOYNER W B. Comments on baseline correction of digital strong-motion data: examples from the 1999 Hector Mine, California, earthquake[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2002, 92(4): 1543-1560.
    [29]
    BOORE D M. On pads and filters: processing strong-motion data[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2005, 95(2): 745-750.
    [30]
    CONVERSE A M, BRADY A G. BAP: basic strong-motion accelerogram processing software; Version 1.0[R]. Reston: United States Department of the Interior, Geological Survey, 1992.
    [31]
    RATHJE E M, FARAJ F, RUSSELL S, et al. Empirical relationships for frequency content parameters of earthquake ground motions[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2004, 20(1): 119-144.
    [32]
    BOORE D M. Effect of baseline corrections on displacements and response spectra for several recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2001, 91(5): 1199-1211.
    [33]
    AKKAR S, BOMMER J J. Influence of long-period filter cut-off on elastic spectral displacements[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2006, 35(9): 1145-1165.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (924) PDF downloads(104) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return