Volume 25 Issue 6
Dec.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LIU Yang, GUO Hao, WU Qing-jun, ZHANG Jing-jing, XIE Dong-xuan, ZHUANG Wei-min. Forming quality prediction of aluminum alloy self-piercing riveted joints based on deep learning[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(6): 135-145. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.06.012
Citation: LIU Yang, GUO Hao, WU Qing-jun, ZHANG Jing-jing, XIE Dong-xuan, ZHUANG Wei-min. Forming quality prediction of aluminum alloy self-piercing riveted joints based on deep learning[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(6): 135-145. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.06.012

Forming quality prediction of aluminum alloy self-piercing riveted joints based on deep learning

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.06.012
Funds:

Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2025MS888

Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2022QE264

Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2022QE253

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52305384

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52272364

Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province YDZJ202401593ZYTS

More Information
  • Corresponding author: LIU Yang (1994-), male, associate professor, PhD, liuyangctgu@126.com
  • Received Date: 2024-06-04
  • Accepted Date: 2025-04-30
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-02-11
  • Publish Date: 2025-12-28
  • To address complex simulation modeling, high experimental costs, and low efficiency, a data-driven prediction method for the forming quality of self-piercing riveted (SPR) joints was proposed. Firstly, image segmentation technology was employed to preprocess the cross-sectional images of SPR joints obtained from experiments, generating categorized cross-sectional images for model training. These images meticulously labelled different parts of the rivet, upper plate, lower plate, and background, providing the model with abundant visual information. A dataset based on experimental images was established to build a deep learning model with a conditional generative adversarial network architecture based on convolutional neural networks. The thicknesses of the upper and lower plates and the length of the rivet were integrated into a vector containing three scalar values as the input for this network model. During the model training phase, 15 different combinations of riveting process parameters were designed, and the model was trained and predicted in two stages. Through extensive training with experimental data and parameter adjustments, the learning effect of the model was continuously optimized. In the prediction phase, the model's output was compared and analyzed with the experimentally obtained cross-sectional images of joints, with a focus on two key geometric parameters: rivet spread and residual bottom thickness. The results indicate that the trained deep learning model can accurately predict the cross-sectional shape of joints for various combinations of base plate thickness and rivet length, with average prediction accuracies of 92.03% and 92.48% for rivet spread and residual thickness, respectively. The developed model for predicting the forming quality of SPR joints demonstrates high accuracy, thereby enhancing the efficiency of the joining process design.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    DU B, LI Q C, ZHENG C Q, et al. Application of lightweight structure in automobile bumper beam: A review[J]. Materials, 2023, 16(3): 967. doi: 10.3390/ma16030967
    [2]
    WANG Lin, HU Guang-shan. Study on performance of self-piercing riveted joints of aluminium alloy three-layer sheet for automotive bodies[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2024, 31(6): 95-102.
    [3]
    LI Yong-bing, MA Yun-wu, LOU Ming, et al. Advances in spot joining technologies of lightweight thin-walled structures[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 56(6): 125-146.
    [4]
    OUYANG Xiao, QIN Deng-lin, ZHAO Sheng-dun, et al. Research on plastic deformation behaviors and process parameters of dieless clinching joints[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2024, 31(1): 41-49.
    [5]
    LIU Yang, ZHUANG Wei-min, HE Xiao-cong. Research progress on key technology of numerical simulation of forming process and mechanical properties of self-piercing riveted joint[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2022, 58(22): 168-185.
    [6]
    YOU Ren-zheng, DOU Wei, ZHANG Hong-shen, et al. Influence of process parameters of 2024 aluminum alloy self-piercing riveting on fretting slip of joint[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2024, 31(11): 105-111.
    [7]
    ZHAO H, HAN L, LIU X P, et al. Comparisons of formation process and quality between two-layer and three-layer self-piercing riveted joints[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2023, 127(9): 4745-4767.
    [8]
    TASSLER T, ISRAEL M, GOEDE M F, et al. Robust joining point design for semi-tubular self-piercing rivets[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2018, 98(1): 431-440.
    [9]
    MA Y W, LOU M, LI Y B, et al. Effect of rivet and die on self-piercing rivetability of AA6061-T6 and mild steel CR4 of different gauges[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2018, 251: 282-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.08.020
    [10]
    KAM D H, JEONG T E, KIM J. A quality study of a self-piercing riveted joint between vibration-damping aluminum alloy and dissimilar materials[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(17): 5947. doi: 10.3390/app10175947
    [11]
    ZHANG Qi-sen, PENG Gui-zhi, WANG Xiao-li. Multi-index optimization on forming quality of self-piercing riveting for aluminium-steel materials based on orthogonal experiment[J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2020, 45(3): 87-91.
    [12]
    ASATI B, SHAJAN N, SINGH ARORA K. Effect of process parameters on joint performance in self-piercing riveted dissimilar automotive steel joints[J]. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2022, 62: 721-726. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.658
    [13]
    XIE Z Q, YAN W M, YU C, et al. Improved shear strength design of cold-formed steel connection with single self-piercing rivet[J]. Thin-walled Structures, 2018, 131: 708-717. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2018.03.025
    [14]
    LIU Y P, LI H, ZHAO H, et al. Effects of the die parameters on the self-piercing riveting process[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2019, 105(7): 3353-3368.
    [15]
    TU Xiao-ming, JIN Jia-geng, LI Guang-yao, et al. Research on matching design of electromagnetic self-piercing riveting die based on neural network prediction[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2025, 32(5): 43-51.
    [16]
    FERRÁNDIZ B, DAOUD M, KOHOUT N, et al. Prediction of cross-sectional features of SPR joints based on the punch force-displacement curve using machine learning[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2023, 128(9): 4023-4034.
    [17]
    LIN J P, QI C W, WAN H L, et al. Prediction of cross-tension strength of self-piercing riveted joints using finite element simulation and XGBoost algorithm[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 34(1): 36. doi: 10.1186/s10033-021-00551-w
    [18]
    WU Q J, LIU Y, DAI Y L, et al. High-fidelity prediction of forming quality for self-piercing riveted joints in aluminum alloy based on machine learning[J]. Materials Today Communications, 2024, 41: 110319. doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.110319
    [19]
    FANG Y, HUANG L, ZHAN Z, et al. Effect analysis for the uncertain parameters on self-piercing riveting simulation model using machine learning model[J]. SAE Technical Papers, 2020, DOI: 10.4271/2020-01-0219.
    [20]
    CHEN S W, JIN D, HE H S, et al. Deep learning based online nondestructive defect detection for self-piercing riveted joints in automotive body manufacturing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2023, 19(8): 9134-9144. doi: 10.1109/TII.2022.3226246
    [21]
    KARATHANASOPOULOS N, PANDYA K S, MOHR D. Self-piercing riveting process: Prediction of joint characteristics through finite element and neural network modeling[J]. Journal of Advanced Joining Processes, 2021, 3: 100040. doi: 10.1016/j.jajp.2020.100040
    [22]
    ZHAO H, HAN L, LIU Y P, et al. Automatic and robust design for multiple self-piercing riveted joints using deep neural network[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2022, 122(2): 947-975. doi: 10.1007/s00170-022-09893-8
    [23]
    LI S M, YIN G Z, MA J Z, et al. Generation method for shaded relief based on conditional generative adversarial nets[J]. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-information, 2022, 11(7): 374. doi: 10.3390/ijgi11070374
    [24]
    SHAFIQ M, GU Z Q. Deep residual learning for image recognition: A survey[J]. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(18): 8972. doi: 10.3390/app12188972
    [25]
    LIANG X L, XU J. Biased ReLU neural networks[J]. Neurocomputing, 2021, 423: 71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.09.050
    [26]
    WANG X Y, LIU J. Spatially regularized Leaky ReLU in dual space for CNN based image segmentation[J]. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 2024, 18(6): 1320-1342. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2024016
    [27]
    RADFORD A, METZ L, CHINTALA S. Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks[J]. Computer Science, 2015, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1511.06434.
    [28]
    ISOLA P, ZHU J Y, ZHOU T H, et al. Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks[C]//IEEE. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). New York: IEEE, 2017: 5967-5976.
    [29]
    MAO X D, LI Q, XIE H R, et al. Least squares generative adversarial networks[C]//IEEE. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). New York: IEEE, 2017: 2813-2821.
    [30]
    LEDIG C, THEIS L, HUSZÁR F, et al. Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network[C]//IEEE. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). New York: IEEE, 2017: 105-114.
    [31]
    PATHAK D, KRÄHENBVHL P, DONAHUE J, et al. Context encoders: Feature learning by inpainting[C]//IEEE. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). New York: IEEE, 2016: 2536-2544.
    [32]
    LIU Xiao-guang, ZHU Wei-qing, ZHOU Bo, et al. Formation mechanism and evolution of welding residual stress in thick plate T-joint[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(4): 179-189. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.04.013
    [33]
    BARAKAT A, BIANCHI P. Convergence and dynamical behavior of the ADAM algorithm for nonconvex stochastic optimization[J]. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 2021, 31(1): 244-274. doi: 10.1137/19M1263443

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1084) PDF downloads(95) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return