Volume 25 Issue 6
Dec.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
NIU Shi-feng, MU Jun-jie, PU Ze-yu, ZHAO Chen-hao. Hierarchical assessment method for vehicle accident risk classification based on temporal misalignment causal variables and sub-objective training[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(6): 293-306. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.06.024
Citation: NIU Shi-feng, MU Jun-jie, PU Ze-yu, ZHAO Chen-hao. Hierarchical assessment method for vehicle accident risk classification based on temporal misalignment causal variables and sub-objective training[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2025, 25(6): 293-306. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.06.024

Hierarchical assessment method for vehicle accident risk classification based on temporal misalignment causal variables and sub-objective training

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.06.024
Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52372322

Fundamental and Interdisciplinary Disciplines Breakthrough Plan of the Ministry of Education of China JYB2025XDXM104

Scientist+Engineer Team Construction Program of Shaanxi Qinchuangyuan 2024KXJ-173

More Information
  • Corresponding author: NIU Shi-feng (1982-), male, professor, PhD, nsf530@gfscw.cn
  • Received Date: 2025-04-14
  • Accepted Date: 2025-09-26
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-07-16
  • Publish Date: 2025-12-28
  • In response to the problem of low assessment accuracy brought by the existing model using the relationship of "historical factors-historical accidents" to replace the relationship of "historical factors-future accidents", a hierarchical evaluation method was proposed for vehicle future accident risk oriented toward traffic management practice. Based on massive static traffic management data, characterization indicators were designed and determined around vehicle attributes, historical violations, and historical accidents. Historical static indicators were mismatched with future accident risk to construct a temporal misalignment causal dataset. Coupled with the multi-layer and multi-dimensional needs of accident risk prevention and control from traffic management department, a sub-objective training method was applied. Weighted samples were used to train high-, medium-, and low-accuracy sub-models. Logical rules were then integrated to output four risk levels: high, medium, low, and extremely low. Analysis results show that the temporal-misaligned modeling approach significantly improves the recognition performance compared to its temporal-aligned counterpart. The designed fusion model exhibits excellent overall performance across five vehicle types. The accuracy rate and recall rate for each vehicle type are 78.78% - 93.80% and 72.01% - 93.98%, respectively, while the precision of very-low-risk identification exceeds 97%. A graded change in prediction precision across risk levels meets the requirement for graded identification of vehicles with different accident risks. The model demonstrates good robustness. When migrated and applied to different years and specific vehicles, the model has an overall accuracy rate of 82.71% and an overall recall rate of 93.67%. Although recognition performance is somewhat affected, the final results still adequately meet practical requirements. In particular, the model's identification precision for extremely low-risk vehicles is maintained at a high level of 99.60%. Therefore, the construction of the temporal misalignment dataset and the sub-objective training method effectively improve the recognition performance of vehicle future accident risk, and provide a feasible technical path for traffic management department to carry out hierarchical and graded risk prevention and control.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    SAMEEN M, PRADHAN B. Severity prediction of traffic accidents with recurrent neural networks[J]. Applied Sciences, 2017, 7(6): 476. doi: 10.3390/app7060476
    [2]
    SHI X P, WONG Y D, LI M Z, et al. A feature learning approach based on XGBoost for driving assessment and risk prediction[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2019, 129: 170-179.
    [3]
    HAN L, YU R J, WANG C Z, et al. Transformer-based modeling of abnormal driving events for freeway crash risk evaluation[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2024, 165: 104727. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2024.104727
    [4]
    ZHANG Jun, HU Zhen-bo, ZHU Xin-shan. Real-time traffic accident prediction based on AdaBoost classifier[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2017, 37(1): 284-288.
    [5]
    YU L, DU B W, HU X, et al. Deep spatio-temporal graph convolutional network for traffic accident prediction[J]. Neurocomputing, 2021, 423: 135-147. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.09.043
    [6]
    JI Xiao-feng, XIE Shi-kun, QIN Wen-wen, et al. Dynamic prediction of traffic accident risk in risky curve sections based on vehicle trajectory data[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 35(4): 277-285.
    [7]
    WANG Hai-xing, WANG Xiang-yu, WANG Zhao-xian, et al. Dangerous driving behavior clustering analysis for hazardous materials transportation based on data mining[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2020, 20(1): 183-189.
    [8]
    LYU Neng-chao, GAO Jin-jin, WANG Wei-feng, et al. Classification of driving style using simplified features of headway under the connected vehicles environment[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2022, 40(1): 116-125, 168.
    [9]
    CHEN J S, ZHANG Q X, CHEN J X, et al. A driving risk assessment framework considering driver's fatigue state and distraction behavior[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2024, 25(12): 20120-20136. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2024.3446832
    [10]
    XU Ting, ZHANG Xiang, ZHANG Ya-kun, et al. Truck driver safety tendency classification based on the AdaBoost algorithm[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2019, 19(4): 1273-1281.
    [11]
    GUO M, ZHAO X H, YAO Y, et al. A study of freeway crash risk prediction and interpretation based on risky driving behavior and traffic flow data[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2021, 160: 106328.
    [12]
    LI Xue, ZHAO Ning, ZHENG Xuan. Road traffic safety evaluation based on cloud mode[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2015, 41(8): 1219-1224.
    [13]
    ELVIK R, ULSTEIN H, WIFSTAD K, et al. An empirical Bayes before-after evaluation of road safety effects of a new motorway in Norway[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2017, 108: 285-296.
    [14]
    CHEN Zhao-ming, XU Wen-yuan. An analysis of factors influencing freeway crashes with a negative binomial model[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2022, 40(1): 28-35.
    [15]
    GIROTTO E, DE ANDRADE S M, GONZáLEZ A D, et al. Professional experience and traffic accidents/near-miss accidents among truck drivers[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2016, 95: 299-304.
    [16]
    LYU Neng-chao, WANG Yu-gang, ZHOU Ying, et al. Review of road traffic safety analysis and evaluation methods[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2023, 36(4): 183-201.
    [17]
    CHENG Tan. Research on road traffic accident data mining and its application[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Tech-nology, 2009.
    [18]
    MA X L, XING Y Y, LU J. Causation analysis of hazardous material road transportation accidents by Bayesian network using genie[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2018, 2018(1): 6248105.
    [19]
    VERAN T, PORTIER P E, FOUQUET F. Interpretable hierarchical symbolic regression for safety-critical systems with an application to highway crash prediction[J]. Engi-neering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 117: 105534. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105534
    [20]
    YANG B, ZHANG L N. Prediction method of motor vehicle traffic accident based on support vector machine[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 631/632: 284-287. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.631-632.284
    [21]
    BAGLOEE S A, ASADI M. Crash analysis at intersections in the CBD: A survival analysis model[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2016, 94: 558-572. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.10.019
    [22]
    ZHANG Guo-qiang. Design and implementation of traffic accident prediction system based on machine learning[D]. Harbin: Heilongjiang University, 2019.
    [23]
    XU Hui-ying, QIU Chen-lu. Correlation model of vehicle color and risk level of accident[J]. China Public Security (Academy Edition), 2015(2): 59-63.
    [24]
    LI Yi-jing. Analysis of influencing factors and prediction of severity of road traffic accidents in China[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2020.
    [25]
    ZHANG Chen-jia, PANG Song-ling, ZHANG Lu-lu. Research on safety risk assessment of electric vehicle power batteries[J]. Environmental Technology, 2023, 41(12): 18-23.
    [26]
    ZHANG Xu-xin, WANG Xue-song, MA Yong, et al. International research progress on driving behavior and driving risks[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2020, 33(6): 1-17.
    [27]
    DU Z J, DENG M, LYU N C, et al. A review of road safety evaluation methods based on driving behavior[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 2023, 10(5): 743-761. doi: 10.1016/j.jtte.2023.07.005
    [28]
    ZHANG Chi, ZHOU Yu-ming, ZHAI Yi-yang, et al. Over-view of identification methods of highway accident-prone sections[J]. Journal of Chang'an University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 43(5): 72-87.
    [29]
    OLAYODE I O, DU B, SEVERINO A, et al. Systematic literature review on the applications, impacts, and public perceptions of autonomous vehicles in road transportation system[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engi-neering (English Edition), 2023, 10(6): 1037-1060. doi: 10.1016/j.jtte.2023.07.006
    [30]
    BASSO F, BASSO L J, PEZOA R. The importance of flow composition in real-time crash prediction[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2020, 137: 105436.
    [31]
    ZHANG Min, LIU Kai, ZHANG Chi, et al. Operating speed prediction models of trucks at interchange ramps based on high-frequency GPS data[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2024, 24(4): 228-242. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2024.04.017
    [32]
    KOTSIANTIS S B. Decision trees: A recent overview[J]. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2013, 39(4): 261-283. doi: 10.1007/s10462-011-9272-4
    [33]
    CHEN T Q, GUESTRIN C. XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system[C]// ACM. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York: ACM, 2016: 785-794.
    [34]
    KE G, MENG Q, FINLEY T, et al. LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree[C]//GUYON I, VON LUXBURG U, BENGIO S, et al. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30. Long Beach: Curran Associates, 2017: 3149-3157.
    [35]
    BREIMAN L. Random forests[J]. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5-32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (908) PDF downloads(108) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return