Volume 26 Issue 2
Feb.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
BAO Dan-wen, QU Yang, ZHOU Jia-yi. Multi-operator collaborative scheduling model for electric apron shuttle buses at hub airports[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(2): 61-78. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.143
Citation: BAO Dan-wen, QU Yang, ZHOU Jia-yi. Multi-operator collaborative scheduling model for electric apron shuttle buses at hub airports[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2026, 26(2): 61-78. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.143

Multi-operator collaborative scheduling model for electric apron shuttle buses at hub airports

doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2026.143
Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China U2433204

School Innovation Program Projects xcxjh20240716

More Information
  • Corresponding author: BAO Dan-wen, associate professor, PhD, E-mail: baodanwen@nuaa.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2025-07-24
  • Accepted Date: 2025-11-27
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-11-04
  • Publish Date: 2026-02-28
  • In response to high allocation cost, low scheduling efficiency, and long delays caused by the independent operation of electric ferry buses at hub airports, a scheduling method under a multi-operator collaborative scheduling mode was proposed for electric ferry buses at airports. An operation mechanism was designed for operators to dispatch buses collaboratively, allowing buses to serve flight requests from different operators. A mixed-integer programming model was constructed for both independent and collaborative modes, aiming to minimize bus operation cost and the total delay in flight support. Two parameters, namely, shared radius and number of shared vehicles, were introduced to quantify the degree of collaboration. An improved genetic algorithm (IGA)-based solution framework was designed. Through the collaborative scheduling strategy, the overall airport operating cost was reduced and flight delays were mitigated. Empirical validation was carried out with Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport as an example. According to the results, compared with the traditional independent scheduling mode, the proposed multi-operator collaborative model significantly improves bus utilization. Under complex operational scenarios, delays can be eliminated by 69.4%–100.0% and operating costs decease by 21.6%–75.7%. The improved genetic algorithm shortens computation time by 85.3% to 99.5% compared to traditional solvers. A high-quality solution can be acquired within a shorter time, while the gap with the objective function can be maintained within 1%. For busy hub airports, the proposed method provides an effective balance between reducing bus operating cost and minimizing flight delays.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    MA Jun-chi, ZHANG Yuan, DUAN Zong-tao, et al. Research review on behavior strategies of electric vehicles considering charging demands[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2024, 24(6): 66-79. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2024.06.004
    [2]
    BAO Dan-wen, CHEN Zhuo, YAO Xin-yu, et al. Pro-active real-time scheduling approach of apron vehicles based on mixed strategy[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2024, 24(3): 251-265. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2024.03.018
    [3]
    BAO D, CHEN Z, KANG D. Proactive real-time scheduling method for apron service vehicles based on mixed strategies[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2024, 192: 110182.
    [4]
    HUANG Hong-xin, HU Li-qun, ZHANG Yi-pu, et al. Configuration optimization for transportation self-consistent energy system architectures under different operation modes[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2024, 24(5): 23-39. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2024.05.003
    [5]
    HAO Xue-li, ZHAO Mei-xuan, PEI Li-li, et al. Optimization on scheduling decision-making for wind/solar/hydrogen storage highway microgrid based on improved Pareto algorithm[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2024, 24(4): 71-82. doi: 10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2024.04.006
    [6]
    ÖNER N, GULTEKIN H, KOC C. The airport shuttle bus scheduling problem[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2021, 59(24): 7400-7422. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1841317
    [7]
    WU M, YU C H, MA W J, et al. Joint optimization of timetabling, vehicle scheduling, and ride-matching in a flexible multi-type shuttle bus system[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2022, 139: 103657. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2022.103657
    [8]
    WEI M, YANG C X, LIU T. An integrated multi-objective optimization for dynamic airport shuttle bus location, route design and departure frequency setting problem[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19(21): 14469. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114469
    [9]
    WANG Y Q, SHANG P. Shuttle bus rerouting and rescheduling problem considering daily demand fluctuation[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 2022: 2917240.
    [10]
    WEI M, YANG C X, SUN B, et al. A multi-objective optimization model for green demand responsive airport shuttle scheduling with a stop location problem[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(10): 6363-6383. doi: 10.3934/era.2023322
    [11]
    PENG J L, SHANGGUAN W, ZHANG L, et al. An optimal scheduling method using multi-agent A* for autonomous shuttle bus [C]//IEEE. 2021 40th Chinese Control Conference (CCC). New York: IEEE, 2021: 6040-6045.
    [12]
    SIGLER D, WANG Q C, LIU Z C, et al. Route optimization for energy efficient airport shuttle operations—A case study from Dallas Fort Worth International Airport[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2021, 94: 102077. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102077
    [13]
    GUO Z K, LAI C S, LUK P, et al. Techno-economic assessment of wireless charging systems for airport electric shuttle buses[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 64: 107123. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2023.107123
    [14]
    AKINCILAR A. A methodology for shuttle scheduling in airports that ensures mitigating arriving passenger congestion under uncertain demand[J]. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 2022, 14(2): 105-114. doi: 10.1109/MITS.2021.3049359
    [15]
    FENG Y F, CAO Z C, ZHANG S L. Shuttle bus timetable adjustment in response to behind-schedule commuter railway disturbance[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(24): 16708. doi: 10.3390/su142416708
    [16]
    BASSO F, IBARRA G, PEZOA R, et al. Horizontal collaboration in the wine supply chain planning: A Chilean case study[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2024, 75(1): 67-84. doi: 10.1080/01605682.2023.2174457
    [17]
    GALKIN A, KUSH Y, ROSLAVTSEV D, et al. Modeling horizontal collaboration efficiency of several supply chains[J]. SHS Web of Conferences, 2021, 92: 06008. doi: 10.1051/shsconf/20219206008
    [18]
    SAFFARI H, ABBASI M, GHEIDAR-KHELJANI J. A robust, sustainable, resilient, and responsive model for forward/reverse logistics network design with a new approach based on horizontal collaboration[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2025, 27(10): 23439-23482.
    [19]
    DENG S J, YUAN Y Y, WANG Y, et al. Collaborative multicenter logistics delivery network optimization with resource sharing[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(11): e0242555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242555
    [20]
    JUSTIANI S, WIBOWO B S. The economic and environmental benefits of collaborative pick-up in urban delivery systems[J]. LOGI—Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, 2022, 13(1): 245-256.
    [21]
    HACARDIAUX T, DEFRYN C, TANCREZ J S, et al. Balancing partner preferences for logistics costs and carbon footprint in a horizontal cooperation[J]. OR Spectrum, 2022, 44(1): 121-153. doi: 10.1007/s00291-021-00651-y
    [22]
    EIRINAKIS P, MOURTOS I, ZAMPOU E. Random serial dictatorship for horizontal collaboration in logistics[J]. Omega, 2022, 111: 102662. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2022.102662
    [23]
    ANGELELLI E, MORANDI V, SPERANZA M G. Optimization models for fair horizontal collaboration in demand-responsive transportation[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2022, 140: 103725. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2022.103725
    [24]
    ZHANG W Y, CHEN Z X, ZHANG S, et al. Composite multi-objective optimization on a new collaborative vehicle routing problem with shared carriers and depots[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 274: 122593. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122593
    [25]
    ZHOU F T, ARVIDSSON A, WU J M, et al. Collaborative electric vehicle routing with meet points[J]. Communications in Transportation Research, 2024, 4: 100135. doi: 10.1016/j.commtr.2024.100135
    [26]
    BAO D W, ZHOU J Y, ZHANG Z Q, et al. Mixed fleet scheduling method for airport ground service vehicles under the trend of electrification[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2023, 108: 102379. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2023.102379
    [27]
    BAO D W, ZHOU J Y, KANG D, et al. Optimization model for electric aircraft tow tractors scheduling under operator cooperation[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2025, 172: 105032. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2025.105032
    [28]
    MENIZ B, TIRYAKI F. Genetic algorithm optimization with selection operator decider[J]. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2025, 50(10): 6931-6941. doi: 10.1007/s13369-024-09068-5
    [29]
    LEI L H, LIU N J, ZHOU J. Nonlinear function optimization based on adaptive genetic algorithm [C]//ACM. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering. New York: ACM, 2020: 1-8.
    [30]
    WANG C F, LIU K, SHEN P P. A novel genetic algorithm for global optimization[J]. Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica, English Series, 2020, 36(2): 482-491. doi: 10.1007/s10255-020-0930-7
    [31]
    DU M Y, YU Q D, JIA F, et al. Modified genetic algorithm for solving function optimization problems [C]//IEEE. 2023 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Human-computer Interaction and Robotics (AIHCIR). New York: IEEE, 2024: 516-520.
    [32]
    PRAVESJIT S, LONGPRADIT P, KANTAWONG K, et al. An improvement of genetic algorithm with Rao algorithm for optimization problems [C]//IEEE. 2021 2nd International Conference on Big Data Analytics and Practices (IBDAP). New York: IEEE, 2021: 72-75.
    [33]
    PEREA F R P, CHEN J, WEISZER M, et al. Airport ground movement optimization revisited: Coupling airport runway spacing to multi-objective routing and scheduling through genetic algorithms [C]//IEEE. 2023 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI). New York: IEEE, 2024: 200-206.
    [34]
    JIANG H, ZHANG J, ZHANG H Y, et al. Multi-objective optimization of airport baggage transport vehicles'scheduling based on improved genetic algorithm[J]. SAE Technical Papers, 2023-1-7090.
    [35]
    HU R, WANG D Y, FENG H L, et al. Joint gate-runway scheduling considering carbon emissions, airport noise and ground-air coordination[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2024, 116: 102555. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102555
    [36]
    ZHU Z N, LI X, CHEN H Y, et al. An effective and robust genetic algorithm with hybrid multi-strategy and mechanism for airport gate allocation[J]. Information Sciences, 2024, 654: 119892. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2023.119892
    [37]
    GUEDAN-PECKER F, RAMIREZ-ATENCIA C. Airport take-off and landing optimization through genetic algorithms[J]. Expert Systems, 2024, 41(8): e13565. doi: 10.1111/exsy.13565
    [38]
    RAEESI R, ZOGRAFOS K G. The electric vehicle routing problem with time windows and synchronised mobile battery swapping[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2020, 140: 101-129. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2020.06.012
    [39]
    DING X S, JIAN S S. Revenue sharing and resource allocation for cooperative multimodal transport systems[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2024, 164: 104666. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2024.104666
    [40]
    American Public Transportation Association (APTA). Impacts of spare ratio rules on vehicle availability[Z]. Washington DC: American Public Transportation Association, 2025.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (588) PDF downloads(274) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return